While most people associate love with warm feelings, it can also be used to describe principles, beliefs, or nonhuman animals. Philosophers have debated the exact definition of love for centuries, but most agree that it involves feelings of strong affection. Let’s explore Freud’s study of love and Brown’s account of love. Which one is correct? The answers to these questions will help you decide whether or not love is a real emotion. Here are some definitions of love.
Sigmund Freud’s study of love
In 1897-1898, Sigmund Freud abandoned his seduction theory, citing problems with bringing his analysis to a conclusion. In the letter, Freud cited his inability to demonstrate complete success and a lack of evidence for a sense of reality. This is because he believed the unconscious was incapable of discriminating between true and false. Further, Freud did not consider any less authoritarian forms of collective behaviour.
Sigmund Freud’s critique
If you’ve ever read a romance novel, you’ve probably encountered Sigmund Freud’s criticism of love. Freud saw love and hate as two separate instincts. One is a desire for pleasure, and the other is a frustrated reaction to disappointment. Those who understand Freud’s critique of love will see the similarity between these two impulses and how they can be combined in a story.
Sigmund Freud’s account of love as an emotion
Sigmund Freud’s theory of love as an emotion is flawed for several reasons. Firstly, Freud assumed that love is an unchangeable and universal emotion based on a common model: mother-infant bonding. But Freud’s model of love is not based on the fact that all couples are equal; in fact, a child’s repression of love for his parents may be based on his own misconstrued idea of love.
Brown’s account of love as an emotion
Unlike other basic emotions, love is not a single affect program or a fixed group of blended emotions. Instead, it is an enduring disposition. While it is not a basic emotion, Brown’s account offers important advantages over other theories of love. Love is a complex emotion construction, and unlike other emotions, it is not reducible to notions of attachment, affection, or evaluation. It is therefore difficult to categorize.
Hamlyn’s account of love as an emotion
While Hamlyn presents a plausible conception of love as an emotion, his description is too simplistic. The concept of love is too varied to be encapsulated in one emotion, argue Pismenny and Prinz (2017). In their account, love is an emotion that is formed by a range of interactions between lovers, which in turn is shaped by shared experiences. Nevertheless, Hamlyn’s account is a worthy read if you want to explore the nuances of love as an emotion.